Comparison
Asperitas vs GRC (Green Revolution Cooling)
Asperitas vs GRC (Green Revolution Cooling): Dutch immersion cooling systems built as one architecture for compute, cooling, power and control at high…
Data Center Sustainability · both listings verified
| Field | Asperitas Dutch immersion cooling systems built as one architecture for compute, cooling, power and control at high density. | GRC (Green Revolution Cooling) Immersion cooling systems for AI, HPC and edge data centres, sold as racks, tanks and dielectric fluid. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing published | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Starting price | ||
| Licensing | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing details | No published price list; systems are quoted per deployment through contact or a technology partner. | No published price list; hardware and fluid are quoted per deployment through the vendor's contact channel. |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | On-premise | On-premise |
| Region support | EU, Global | US |
| Compliance | Not stated | Not stated |
| API available | No | No |
| Last verified | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-27 |
Editor's take on Asperitas
The passive option is the interesting one: no pumps means fewer moving parts and a simpler service story, which suits edge sites where nobody is on hand, while the forced-convection line covers high-TDP accelerators. Treating cooling as one architecture with power and control avoids the usual integration debt of bolting a tank onto an existing hall. The trade-off is that immersion still needs server compatibility sign-off, and a partner network of thirty plus implies the integration work sits with the operator. No published pricing, and the Dutch base helps for EU deployments. Worth a look where water is unavailable rather than merely expensive.
Read the Asperitas listingEditor's take on GRC (Green Revolution Cooling)
A hardware decision rather than a software subscription: immersion replaces part of the air-handling plant, so the comparison is capital cost and deployment disruption against cooling energy and rack density. The vendor's claims, 11% lower server power, up to 90% less cooling energy and 368 kW per system, are the specification to verify in a pilot, since results depend on climate, workload profile and the servers chosen. Immersion-ready hardware lists are the practical starting point, because not every server can be submerged and warranties are the usual surprise. Suits operators with compute-bound workloads and a data hall that has run out of air-cooling headroom.
Read the GRC (Green Revolution Cooling) listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons