Comparison
CimpactPro vs Green Project
CimpactPro vs Green Project: Carbon footprint, CBAM and ESG reporting software aligned with ISO 14064-1 and GHG Protocol. AI climate management platform…
Carbon Accounting · both listings verified
| Field | CimpactPro Carbon footprint, CBAM and ESG reporting software aligned with ISO 14064-1 and GHG Protocol. | Green Project AI climate management platform for corporate, product and supply chain emissions. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing published | Pricing on request | Custom quote only |
| Starting price | ||
| Licensing | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing details | No public price list. The site routes prospective customers to a demo request and contact form, and offers sector-specific custom solutions; subscription pricing is not published on the site. | No pricing page is published on greenprojecttech.com; plans are scoped through a demo booking and contact with the sales team. |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | Web | Web, Marketplace |
| Region support | Global | US, UK, EU, APAC |
| Compliance | GHG Protocol, ISO 14064, CBAM | GHG Protocol |
| API available | No | No |
| Last verified | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-22 |
Editor's take on CimpactPro
Aimed at organisations that need auditable carbon footprint and CBAM reporting under ISO 14064-1 and the GHG Protocol, including municipal and city-level emissions reporting that many corporate tools leave out. Sector configurations span agriculture through tourism, which shortens setup for those entity types. The trade-off is transparency and integration: no price list is published, so scope and cost only appear after a demo request, and no API is recorded for feeding data into other systems. Buyers needing published prices or deep system integration should look elsewhere first.
Read the CimpactPro listingEditor's take on Green Project
Aimed at larger enterprises that need corporate, product and supply chain footprints plus renewable energy procurement and transition planning in one platform, with disclosure workflows and supplier data checked against the GHG Protocol's data quality dimensions. Geographic coverage spans the US, UK, EU and APAC. The trade-off is procurement and integration: no pricing page is published, so scope and cost arrive through a demo, and no API is recorded for moving data into other systems. Mid-sized teams wanting a published price should start with a lighter tool.
Read the Green Project listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons