Comparison
Novata vs osapiens
Novata vs osapiens: Sustainability data collection and CSRD reporting for private markets, with SFDR coverage. AI compliance platform for CSRD and ESRS…
ESG & CSRD Reporting · both listings verified
| Field | Novata Sustainability data collection and CSRD reporting for private markets, with SFDR coverage. | osapiens AI compliance platform for CSRD and ESRS disclosure, with supplier data and product regulation files in one system. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription | Custom quote |
| Pricing published | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Starting price | ||
| Licensing | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing details | No public price list; the vendor routes buyers to a demo request. Cost is quoted per engagement. | No published price list; the vendor books a demo and quotes per scope of regulations and entities. |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Web, Cloud |
| Region support | Global, EU, US | EU |
| Compliance | CSRD | CSRD, ESRS |
| API available | No | No |
| Last verified | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-27 |
Editor's take on Novata
Built for private equity, venture and portfolio companies rather than for listed-company reporting teams, which shows in the data collection model: contributors are nudged and tracked, and the same record is reused for investor questionnaires, customer surveys and regulatory filings. The disclosure scope is concrete, naming CSRD with double materiality and SFDR adverse indicators, and the audit trail runs through QA/QC workflows rather than ad-hoc spreadsheets. Integration is file and warehouse based, SFTP, Snowflake and Databricks, so an existing data stack can feed it. Pricing is not published, so a buyer should treat the first step as a scoping call with the reporting obligations already written down.
Read the Novata listingEditor's take on osapiens
Useful where sustainability disclosure cannot be separated from supplier and product compliance: one system carries CSRD and ESRS reporting, EUDR due diligence, packaging rules and the digital product passport, with the underlying supplier records in the same place. The double materiality assessment is treated as a working step rather than a template, and the vendor states the Omnibus I scope change of March 2026 on the CSRD page. The trade-off is scope: the platform is built around EU regulation, so a company reporting only to US frameworks pays for modules it does not file. Pricing is demo-gated, so define the regulation set before the first call.
Read the osapiens listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons