GreenAIXSubmit a tool

Moving carbon accounting off spreadsheets

What to require from a carbon platform when the current inventory is a workbook that only one person understands.

5 tools in this scenario · verified 2026-10-27

Spreadsheets get a company through its first two reporting cycles and then become a risk. The inventory lives in one file, the factors are hard-coded, the formulas change between versions and nobody can reproduce last year's number once the owner leaves. The move to a platform is usually triggered by an audit request, a buyer's questionnaire or a change of reporting standard rather than by a desire for software. That shape of migration decides which platform fits: the important capabilities are importing the existing inventory without loss, keeping a versioned record of factors and assumptions, and exporting something an auditor can follow. Platforms differ sharply on how they treat the past, whether they re-baseline historical years, and how much of the data entry is manual. A tool that is fast to start but keeps no calculation history will not fix the underlying problem. The criteria below are the ones that separate a re-platforming project from a portal that simply displays numbers.

What to evaluate

  1. 1

    Import of the existing inventory

    Check whether activity data, factors and organisational boundaries can be imported with their history, and whether the platform keeps the original values visible after recalculation.

  2. 2

    Factor versioning and sources

    Require dated factor sets with a cited source, and a record of which factor version produced each reported number. A single editable factor table recreates the spreadsheet problem.

  3. 3

    Audit trail and restatement

    Ask how a correction to a prior year is recorded, who approved it and what the report shows. Assurance-ready platforms keep a change log rather than overwriting the figure.

  4. 4

    Scope 3 data collection model

    Decide whether suppliers enter data directly, whether files are imported, or whether spend-based estimates stand in. Each choice changes the effort in year two and the quality claim you can make.

  5. 5

    Exit and export

    Confirm a full export of activity data, factors and reports in a machine-readable format. A platform that only exports PDFs returns the organisation to the same single-source risk later.

Tools for this scenario

All tools

Carbon Accounting

Persefoni

Carbon accounting and climate disclosure platform for enterprises and financial institutions.

Pricing
Freemium
Compliance
CSRD, ESRS, GHG Protocol, SB 253
Platforms
Web, API
Verified 2026-10-22Read the record

Carbon Accounting

Plan A

Carbon accounting, decarbonisation and ESG reporting platform for businesses.

Pricing
Custom quote
Compliance
GHG Protocol
Platforms
Web
Verified 2026-10-22Read the record

Carbon Accounting

Carbonhound

Carbon management software for measuring emissions and producing disclosure-ready reports.

Pricing
Subscription
Compliance
SB 253, CBAM, SBTi
Platforms
Web
Verified 2026-10-22Read the record

Carbon Accounting

Greenly

Carbon accounting and ESG platform for measuring, reporting and reducing emissions.

Pricing
Custom quote
Compliance
CSRD, GHG Protocol, SBTi
Platforms
Web, API
Verified 2026-10-22Read the record

Carbon Accounting

Zevero

Carbon accounting for growing businesses, with expert review built into each tier rather than sold as a separate project.

Pricing
Subscription
Compliance
GHG Protocol, ISO 14064
Platforms
Web, Cloud
Verified 2026-10-27Read the record

Sources

Last verified 2026-10-27. Figures on the linked tools are checked against the sources above; confirm pricing and compliance coverage before signing.