Comparison
BoaviztAPI vs Carbon Aware SDK
BoaviztAPI vs Carbon Aware SDK: Open API for assessing the environmental impacts of servers, cloud instances and ICT equipment. Open-source Web API and…
Sustainable Cloud · both listings verified
| Field | BoaviztAPI Open API for assessing the environmental impacts of servers, cloud instances and ICT equipment. | Carbon Aware SDK Open-source Web API and CLI for shifting software to lower-carbon times and regions. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Pricing published | Public pricing | Public pricing |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Licensing | Open source | Open source |
| Pricing details | AGPL-3.0; the README points to a public demo API, and the API can be run locally with Docker or installed with pip. | MIT licensed; the Web API can be deployed as a container and the CLI is available for non-cloud deployments. |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | API, Web | API, On-premise, Cloud |
| Region support | Global | Global |
| Compliance | Not stated | Not stated |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Last verified | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-22 |
Editor's take on BoaviztAPI
Built for engineers and analysts who need component-level embedded and usage impacts for servers, cloud instances, CPUs, GPUs and storage, and who are comfortable calling an HTTP API from their own tooling. The trade-off is integration and obligation: it returns modelled impacts from published methodologies rather than measured emissions, so results are only as current as its data sources, and AGPL-3.0 licensing shapes how derived services can be offered. A public demo API speeds evaluation, while production use means hosting it and keeping methodology and data updated; teams wanting a ready reporting interface should pair it with a frontend such as Datavizta.
Read the BoaviztAPI listingEditor's take on Carbon Aware SDK
Built for software teams that want to move batch work to cleaner hours or regions and prefer a reusable API and CLI over bespoke grid-data code. Two integration paths exist: the Web API can be deployed as a container and the CLI covers non-cloud deployments, with a plugin architecture for carbon-aware logic. The trade-off is that the SDK supplies awareness logic over grid intensity data, not measurement of what a workload actually draws, so the savings estimate depends on the data source configured for each location. Teams needing measured per-service emissions should pair it with metering tooling.
Read the Carbon Aware SDK listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons