Comparison
nvtop vs Scaphandre
nvtop vs Scaphandre: htop-style GPU and accelerator monitor that charts power draw across many vendors. Metrology agent exposing power and energy…
AI Energy Monitoring · both listings verified
| Field | nvtop htop-style GPU and accelerator monitor that charts power draw across many vendors. | Scaphandre Metrology agent exposing power and energy consumption metrics for hosts and virtual machines. |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Pricing published | Public pricing | Public pricing |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Licensing | Open source | Open source |
| Pricing details | GPLv3 licensed; install from the distribution package manager or build from source. | Apache 2.0 licensed; installable from crates.io, with packaged builds for RHEL, Debian, Windows and NixOS. |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Assets covered | ||
| Platforms | On-premise | On-premise, Cloud |
| Region support | Global | Global |
| Compliance | Not stated | Not stated |
| API available | No | No |
| Last verified | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-22 |
Editor's take on nvtop
Fits Linux administrators and researchers who want an htop-style live view across mixed accelerators, with charts for utilisation, power, clocks and temperature and vendor coverage spanning AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, Apple silicon and several AI accelerator families. The trade-off is that it is a terminal monitor: no logging, aggregation or API is recorded, so historical and fleet-level analysis needs another collector, and the Apple support is documented as limited. GPLv3 licensing matters if it is redistributed in a commercial image. Teams needing programmatic metrics should use a telemetry exporter instead.
Read the nvtop listingEditor's take on Scaphandre
Fits infrastructure teams that want host and virtual-machine power metrics from bare metal without instrumenting applications, exporting to Prometheus, Riemann or Warp10, or reading them in the terminal. VM metrics can be exposed inside the guest, which suits multi-tenant platforms. The trade-off is granularity and plumbing: it measures at host or VM level rather than per process, and it is an agent an operator deploys, secures and maintains alongside monitoring, with no carbon accounting of its own. Teams needing per-container attribution or ready reports should add tooling above it.
Read the Scaphandre listingJudgement is written by the editor. Paid placements never change the ranking or the recorded field values.
All comparisons